Linked – Review

Gordon Korman. Linked. Scholastic, 2021.

Gordon Korman continues to be one of our favorite YA (young adult) authors. Linked is definitely more serious than many of Korman’s stories, but it still has enough of his light touch. Indeed, one of the his strengths is how most of his writing is directed to and about middle schoolers. Students in middle school should be able to laugh at themselves, but at the same time understand that their enthusiasm has something to offer others.

The title of Linked refers both to its main character, Lincoln “Link” Rowley, and a massive paper chain project that the middle schoolers of Chokecherry, Colorado, create.

As with many YA stories, Linked is told from multiple points of view. In this case, all but one are students at the middle school. The one exception is ReelTok, a YouTube “influencer” who scours the nation looking for sensational and controversial news.

Chokecherry is a small town in the Colorado foothills. It is remote enough that the county seat is nearly a hundred miles away. Everyone knows everyone else. A few years ago some paleontologists from a prestigious Eastern university discovered some dinosaur fossils. A handful of new families moved in. The locals have named them university eggheads. The kids at the middle school call the two students from egghead families the egglets.

Link and his buddies are pranksters. Link is also a star athlete. The original dinosaur finding was not a bone, though some were located afterwards, but coprolites, fossilized dung. Middle schoolers all over the world are fascinated with poop, so Link and his friends devise a prank involving the eggheads and manure. Such stuff is vintage Korman.

However, the story takes a serious turn as one morning student Michael Amoroso discovers a large swastika painted on the ceiling in one of the hallways. People are shocked, and everyone in the school has to endure a three week tolerance training. No one has a clue who did it.

And then swastikas start popping up at other places around the school. Some old timers in town recall a 1978 incident involving the Ku Klux Klan (KKK). One night a large number of crosses were lit on fire around the town. It was long ago enough that few people remember it or want to admit that it happened in their otherwise peaceful small town. Some folks say it never happened.

The swastikas get some attention from local news outlets, and pretty soon ReelTok, the screen name of that YouTube celebrity has set up camp in town, making things to sound even more sensational than they already are. Is Chokecherry, Colorado, really a hotbed of racists? Korman understandably notes that so many journalists these days come with preconceived notions and try to put words into people’s mouths or otherwise lose any pretense of objectivity. That becomes true not just for YouTubers but traditional newspaper writers.

Some people suspect Michael as the swastika maker because he is president of the art club and was the first to see it. Yet Michael himself is one of the minority students at the school. His family is Afro-Caribbean.

Link is mostly annoyed. His father’s punishment for the manure prank is pretty severe: He cannot play soccer this fall for the school team, and Link is one of the best players. Mr. Rowley is head of the local Chamber of Commerce. He is delighted about the dinosaur find and thinks it might be possible to turn Chokecherry into some kind of dinosaur-themed tourist attraction. Anything that makes Chokecherry look bad enrages Link’s father.

Michael and Caroline McNutt, the student council seventh grade president, come up with a plan to overcome the school and town’s reputation. They had heard of a school in Tennessee that in 1999 collected six million paper clips to represent the six million Jews killed in the Nazi Holocaust. (N.B.: That really happened.) Why not a make a construction paper chain of six million links? Students begin this, it gets more publicity, and soon people and schools from all over the world are sending paper chains to contribute.

One of the families from the college working on the dig is Jewish. Dana Levinson, their daughter, is also a seventh grader at the middle school. She is suddenly getting more attention. People feel sorry for her, and mostly do not really know what to say to her. How is she getting along?

There is one more significant plot element which I am reluctant to share because it could be considered a spoiler. Let us just say that we discover that the Levinsons are not the only people in town with a Jewish background.

I had a friend years ago who had been adopted. When she was in her thirties she sought out her birth family. It turned out that her birth family was Jewish, though her adopted family was Christian. The priest in her church was also Jewish; he had converted to Christianity. He said, “Only God knows who the real Jews are.” Perhaps that is a theme of this story as well.

Linked tells the story very effectively. I confess, I got a little misty a couple of times while reading it—something that does not usually happen to me. It is a delightful tale on tolerance. We sometimes need to be reminded of what Harper Lee’s Scout said: “Folks is folks.”

Tom Clancy: Zero Hour – Review

Don Bentley. Tom Clancy: Zero Hour. Putnam, 2022.

Here is the latest from Tom Clancy’s estate. While somewhat formulaic, it is fun to read. The action is nearly nonstop. As I wrote before, Jack Ryan, Jr., here is a lot like Jack Bauer. But once again, we see some uncanny parallels with the real world.

Exactly one week before I started this book, there was a terrible mob action in the city of Seoul, Korea. Over a hundred people were trampled to death when a crowd began running and trampled others. Zero Hour begins with a mass panic in Seoul in which people are trampled. The cause is different, but our hero, Jack Ryan, Jr., is a mere tourist at the time but he gets caught up in the panic. He actually rescues a teenaged girl who was being run over, but he also gets a glimpse of what may really be going on.

In this case, circumstances link Jack up with two Green Berets stationed in Korea who also witnessed some violence while on liberty. We will learn the events are connected.

Unbeknownst to the rest of world, the Supreme Leader of North Korea (DPRK) has been in a coma. A high ranking government ally sees this as an opportunity to take over and finally unite the two Koreas. We learn that there are actually a few riots at the same time, all caused by DPRK agitators who have infiltrated the south. And they are making it look like Americans are behind the chaos.

If there is a problem anywhere in the world, blame it on the USA!

Fans of the original Tom Clancy called themselves technodudes. Some of the most distinctive things about his novels were technological innovations he imagined, such as the caterpillar type propulsion for submarine Red October. The coolest thing about Zero Hour is the secret weapon developed by Russia but being armed for the first time in battle by North Korea. It is a nuclear-powered missile.

Regular ICBMs are basically rockets. They rise in a high arc. Cruise missiles have similar propulsion but fly close to the earth so they are not as easily detected by radar. However, both types of missiles can only go so far before they run out of fuel. Even the cruise missiles, once detected can be tracked. Both kinds can be aimed, but are hard to steer.

Bentley imagines a nuclear-powered missile. Note, it is nuclear powered, not necessarily nuclear armed. It may or may not have a nuclear warhead. Like nuclear-powered submarines and ships, the nuclear power means it will take a very long time to run out of fuel. Such a missile could be launched and travel in a very irregular pattern and also perhaps escape anti-missile missiles. It could spend days in the air and travel all over the world if it had to. That is what the DPRK is planning on using against the ROK.

There are some high level North Korean actors in the book. North Korea may call itself a republic, but it is, in effect, a hereditary monarchy. What happens to the leader’s siblings figures big in the story as do some of the Russians who are on location working with the missile propulsion and those who support them.

Given the right kind of technology, this story is not unrealistic. We have already seen in the real world what can happen when a large group of people in Seoul or elsewhere get panicky. Maybe the rest is not that far-fetched.

Those who have read any of the Jack Ryan, Jr., stories know that he belongs to a clandestine government agency known simply as the Campus. Here the Green Berets recognize that he is some kind of spook, some kind of spy. They also note that his combat training or experience is not typical of the CIA. When they ask him if he is CIA, and he says he is not, they ask him, then, who does he work for. He tells them he works for the OGA. Among spooks and special forces that simply means Other Government Agency. If he told them who he really was working for, he’d have to kill them.

P.S. That last sentence is meant to be a joke, though a DPRK invasion of the ROK would be no joking matter.

The Ghost of Darwin Stuart and The Ghost Writer – Review

L. G. Nixon. The Ghost of Darwin Stewart. Fitting Words, 2021.
———. The Ghost Writer. Fitting Words, 2021.

Two middle school aged friends, Lucy and Schuyler, go to a nearby flea market where they meet a gray-haired man who has a box of unusual ancient artifacts he gives to them. Among the artifacts is a device that looks like a magnifying glass called a Spectrescope (the word is capitalized, as if it is a name). We have a hint of what is coming because prologue of The Ghost of Darwin Stewart is a fictionalized telling of chapter 14 of Isaiah or Book 6 of Paradise Lost, the story of the devil being kicked out of heaven.

The Spectrescope is a symbol or allegory for spiritual discernment. With it, Lucy can see angels and daemons (author’s spelling). There is also a kind of magic mirror and ancient looking weapons suggestion Ephesians 6:11-17, the armor of God. So, yes, there are spiritual battles here.

Similar to the beginning of the book of Job, the devil accuses Lucy of being faithless to God—here represented not as a Lion as in the Narnia Chronicles but as a fox called Iam. I am, of course, is the name God revealed to Moses in Exodus 3:14 and is used throughout Hebrew Scriptures. You get the idea. So the battle involves not just tackling the spirits but dealing with accusations. We are reminded that the devil’s main weapons are lies (see John 8:44) and fear (note Hebrews 2:14-15).

Nixon takes an orthodox view of what ghosts are. They are evil spirits impersonating the dead (see I Chronicles 10:13-14 NET). Since the ghost is allegedly of someone who lived before the Civil War, the ghost’s name has nothing to do with Charles Darwin, it is merely a family name. In popular culture and in this story, ghosts also mean haunted houses.

The Ghost Writer takes Lucy and Schuyler on another adventure. This time it focuses on their school. The Spectrescope and Iam’s other gifts are involved again. Evil spirits seem to be intent on causing school-day havoc. Though there are spiritual battles, we are reminded that the battles are based on what we believe, whether we believe something is true or is a lie (see II Corinthians 10:3-5). So two people at the school are carrying burdens they should not be carrying. The Bible suggests that bitterness can lead to sin and rebellion (e.g., see Acts 8:23). But the Gospel can cure bitterness. When the bitterness is removed, so is the temptation to rebel. After all, God is love (I John 4:7-8).

Frank Peretti popularized such spiritual warfare novels in the eighties. More recently, Ted Dekker has added to the genre. As a teacher, I have observed that some of my high schoolers enjoyed their novels. Nixon, then, has written similar stories featuring young teens, aiming her work at the young adult market. Nixon may be onto something about potential readers. These books are not for everyone, but they could be a source of hope for some.

Chaucer and the House of Fame – Review

Philippa Morgan. Chaucer and the House of Fame. Carroll and Graf, 2004.

Chaucer and the House of Fame caught my eye for two reasons. One was the title: a novel about Chaucer that has something to do with his poem The House of Fame. The second was the cover illustration. It is a copy of Uccello’s The Hunt in the Forest, one of the most interesting paintings from the early Renaissance (c. 1470).

The main focus of the plot does indeed involve a hunt in a forest. In this case, it is the forest of the domain of an English ally in Aquitaine during the Hundred Years’ War. We know that Geoffrey Chaucer was a courtier first for John of Gaunt and then for King Edward III of England. He was dispatched several times to Europe for diplomatic purposes. The author imagines that a trip he took in 1378 was to persuade the Count of Guyac to remain loyal to England. At this point in the history, the French region of Aquitaine was still in British hands.

It happened that about twenty years prior, when Chaucer was serving the army, he was captured by the French and held for ransom at Guayac’s castle. (All we know from history is that he was captured and ransomed a few months later.) While there, he and the Countess developed a friendship. There was a mutual attraction, but there was no affair. In other words, it was a classic example of courtly love. The Countess of Guyac’s name was Rosamond, like the love object in Chaucer’s “Ballade to Rosamond.” The poem’s three stanzas each end with a refrain (modernized): “Though you do to me no dalliance.”

The most entertaining parts of Chaucer and the House of Fame are the many allusions to Chaucer’s work. Ironically, Chaucer’s “The House of Fame” is not one of them—except perhaps that Chaucer here is a guest in a castle where rumors fly and where temptation from Venus may lurk. On his way to Aquitaine, Chaucer passes through Canterbury, as most travelers do when going between London and Dover. He is on a mission, so he is limited in his excursions, but he tells his two traveling companions that he would like to return to Canterbury at some point to visit the Shrine of St. Thomas à Becket.

While en route to Aquitaine on the Continent, they encounter a group of about a hundred pilgrims, many on horse, some on foot, traveling to Compostela for the Shrine of St. James. Chaucer notes a few of them such as a garrulous well-dressed woman and a lean, wary rider who brings up the rear. One of the characters in the novel disguises himself as monk and calls himself Hubert. He knows a lot about hunting. These all foreshadow pilgrims in The Canterbury Tales.

To entertain his traveling companions at one point, Chaucer makes up a story about a noble couple Arveragus and Dorigen. He names those characters after the names of two of the ships in the convoy they take from England to Aquitaine. He would later render the story in poetic form in the Franklin’s Tale. His two young traveling companions end up in a situation that can only be described as a bawdy farce similar to the Miller’s Tale. These are just a few examples.

The story itself centers around the Count who is killed on a boar hunt. It is clear that he was killed by a sword or dagger, not by the boar he had slain. In all this Chaucer is very much a passive character. He observes things, but keeps many of those things to himself. While intrigued by the mystery surrounding the Count’s death, Chaucer does not investigate it or make any inquiries; however, he does observe the unfolding of the solving of the mystery and draws a few conclusions. He, then, is the guileless and naïve observer of people as he presents himself in The Canterbury Tales.

In Chaucer and the House of Fame, if there is one active character, it the man who calls himself Hubert. He can best be described as a soulless serial killer who gets away with murder because he claims to be working for one political leader or another. This is no spoiler; he is not the murderer of the Count. He seems to serve no purpose in the story other than to suggest that some diplomacy like Chaucer’s is honorable and some like Hubert’s is dishonorable.

The story begins with what seems like an irrelevant chapter about the murder of another diplomat from England who had gone to Aquitaine a year before. It does tie in vaguely with some later action, but probably the most significant part of the chapter is that it contains another allusion. The diplomat’s name is Machaut. Machaut was a contemporary of Chaucer and arguably the greatest poet and composer in France at the time. He died in 1377, but not in the manner described in the novel. His poems of courtly love are said to have influenced Sir Geoffrey. Even here there is allusion. Medievalists would get a kick out of this.

The Student Freelance Writer

Student Writer
Image by Pexels. Used with permission.

“The Student Freelance Writer”
Joyce Wilson, Guest Author

Freelance writing is a great option for grad students who are looking to gain experience in their field while earning an income. After all, grad schools usually give students the opportunity to undertake a lot of writing assignments while they are in school, since it helps them develop their skills and have something to put on their resume when they graduate. Today, English Plus+ outlines everything you need to know to get started as a freelance writer.

The Freelance Writing Market

According to Power Publish, high-quality freelance writing has skyrocketed. Although the content marketing and freelance writing markets were already growing pre-COVID-19, the pandemic has accelerated their growth, opening a sea of opportunities for freelancers. Today’s consumers use the internet for information of all sorts, including shopping, news, entertainment, and more. Different sites offer opportunities for both writers and businesses to find work for freelance writing like Upwork and Fiverr, where you can filter jobs by content and price.

According to Writers.com, you don’t need an MFA to call yourself a writer. They state that the traits for becoming a writer are a love of the written word, a desire for possibilities of language, and a willingness to grow and learn continuously.

Creating Your Freelance Writing Business

Turning to freelance writing to earn money means creating your own business. Start by getting an EIN or tax ID. An Employer Identification Number (EIN), also called a Tax ID Number, is a 9-digit code assigned by the IRS to identify your business.

Next, create a business plan that lays out how you’ll structure your business, how you’ll market it, and what your goals are for the near future and beyond. You can find how to write a business plan by using an online template that can walk you through all the steps.

Creating a blog where you can include samples of your writing can be an inexpensive way to have an online presence that you can send prospective employers to view. WordPress is the most common blogging platform but explore several to see which one will work best for you.

Thinking long term, another option worth considering is going back to school for your MBA. This will give you additional expertise to grow your business, and if you choose to benefit from the flexibility of online learning, you can proceed at your own pace, putting what you learn into practice in real time.

Look for Mentors

You may be able to find other freelance writers just by asking friends and acquaintances or looking at Linkedin. Also, LifeTutors helps young people with college, college plans, and finding and keeping a job among other things. They are also a clinically supervised recovery coaching program. If you need help with anything college-related, they are an excellent resource to use.

Becoming a freelance writer is something you can do from anywhere and anytime, making it the perfect job for grad and post-grad students and can become a business that can sustain you for as long as you want to pursue it.

English Plus+ began in 1990 as a spin-off of an SAT tutoring program by an experienced teacher who had learned computer programming. We’d love to hear from you!

Red Sox Fans Are from Mars, Yankees Fans Are from Uranus – Review

Andy Wasif. Red Sox Fans Are from Mars, Yankees Fans Are from Uranus. Triumph, 2010.

There are two ways people pronounce the planet Uranus in English. This book clearly wants us to pronounce it with the accent on the second syllable.

This is written by a Red Sox fan, but it honestly and humorously is meant for both Yankees and Red Sox fans. It has many little stories that make fans of both teams sometimes look good and sometimes look ridiculous.

Fans may recall that a few years before 2004, when things did change some, mocking Yankees fans would chant “1918!”, reminding the Red Sox and their fans the last time the Red Sox won the World Series.

Wasif tells about a friend who was a die-hard Red Sox fan and now lives in Southern California. He was wearing his Red Sox cap. However, it was the winter of 2004-2005, after the Red Sox had beaten the Yankees in the playoffs and swept the World Series. The 1918 chant was outdated. Wasif and his friend were eating in a diner near his California home, and his friend heard someone say “1918!” He got furious, tipped over his table and started yelling at the person. Someone called the police. The young, terrified waitress had tried to tell him that his bill came to nineteen dollars and eighteen cents!

Clearly, there can be problems with fans who take taunts too seriously. The stated goal of Red Sox Fans Are from Mars, Yankees Fans Are from Uranus is to cool things down, to bring some understanding to both sides.

The author presents himself (tongue-in-cheek, of course) as a counselor for members of both fan bases. The Red Sox fans he calls Martians; Yankees fans, Uranians. Much of the book is an attempt to reconcile the two sides—not to get anyone to change his or her allegiance, but to understand them. As he puts it, love your enemies.

The root personality trait that bothers other fans about Red Sox fans is fear. With nearly a century of close calls and near misses, there has developed a sense of doom, that the other shoe will drop. There is also a sense not so much that the Yankees are their rival, but that the Yankees are the bully who picks on them, and every other team and fan base in the American League.

The root personality trait that bothers other fans about Yankees fans is the arrogance or sense of entitlement. “Hey, they’re the Yankees. What else can be said?” I recall during the 2004 ALCS, which the Red Sox won after losing the first three games to the Yankees, Yogi Berra told a current Yankee not to worry, after all, he told him, they were the Red Sox. He snickered, but that time the Sox had the last laugh (finally!).

He tells Red Sox fans who go to Yankee Stadium to show respect. That means paying the $7.00 required for checking a bag at the Stadium. The book came out in 2010, but it looks like the price is about the same today, ranging from six to nine dollars in most cases.

For Yankees fans who are attending a baptism in Massachusetts, show some respect, too. Do not yell “THEEEEEEEEEE YANKEEZ WIN!” like John Sterling during the ceremony.

Chapter six is entitled “Meeting Emotional Needs.” It contains a fascinating, and honestly fairly accurate, “wheel of emotions” diagram. The author then demonstrates how one emotion unchecked can lead to more serious conditions; for example, pensiveness can lead to sadness (think Ecclesiastes) can lead to grief. He uses examples from fans of the two teams, but this appears to be something that could be helpful for others in understanding emotions.

You get the idea. It is a lot of fun. Some quibbles will never be resolved. For example, who used steroids more? Fans on both sides point out suspicions and evidence: A-Rod probably stands out since Clemens admitted it, but Manny Ramirez has been suspiciously silent on the issue.

When my poem, “Why Did You Keep Pedro In?” was published by the Baseball Almanac, they deleted one of the stanzas which begins. “The Yankees suck steroids like soda.” I understand why they omitted it, but it does reflect my bias.

I recall a friend who grew up in the Boston area complaining in the late sixties about New York Times sports stars. New York City and the Times have such a cultural influence that mediocre players are often touted as great, while they would probably be ignored except that they played in New York. Hey, Tom Tresh was a Major Leaguer and a switch-hitter, but he was no Mickey Mantle, though you might not know it if you just read the Times back then.

I got an early introduction to this. As a young Pittsburgh Pirates fan, I was ecstatic that the Pirates beat the Yankees in the 1960 World Series. I attended game seven with my father, but that is another story. Tell me, though, who was voted the Most Valuable Player in the series? A Yankee! Sportswriters’ bias! Eventually, writers in New York would concede what a terrific player Roberto Clemente was, even though he performed for a “small market” audience.

Bill James in his The Politics of Glory notes that the Baseball Hall of Fame is partly owned by the State of New York. He attributes the election of certain players from New York teams (Yankees, Mets, Dodgers, Giants) to that bias as well. N.B.: I read this book years ago. It has been revised with the title Whatever Happened to the Hall of Fame? Bill James, of course, is the Sabremetrics guru, so we should pay at least some attention to what he has to say.

I apologize if I sounded too serious in the last couple of paragraphs, but I could not help it. I am a Martian, that is how we are. Red Sox Fans Are from Mars, Yankees Fans Are from Uranus, though, is a lot of fun. I confess it might be slightly dated now because since 2010 the Red Sox have won two more titles. They are out of it this year, but, as Red Sox fans always say, wait till next year.

P.S. As a side note, I suspect this year’s ALCS might be a groaner for American League fans. Though the Yankees and Astros both have a good sized fan base, they are currently probably the two most hated teams in the league. Whoever many fans are rooting for—whether the arrogant Yankees or the cheating Astros—they probably have to hold their noses doing it.

The System of the World – Review

This reviews the third volume of the Baroque Cycle. To begin reviewing, go to the review of the first volume, Quicksilver.

Neal Stephenson. The System of the World. Morrow, 2004. The Baroque Cycle.

“On the contrary, my lord,” Dappa said, “there is nothing quite so civilized as to be recognized in public places as the author of books no one has read.” (161-162)

I completed the Baroque Cycle. Let me begin by saying that it was worth it. It is a very entertaining story with some profound observations on science, economics, and politics, as we have already seen.

The System of the World actually gets its title from the third part of Newton’s Principia Mathematica which has the same title. Newton, of course, was describing how the gravity of the sun held the planets and comets in their orbits and how the gravity of the planets kept their moons in their orbits. That is part of the story here as Newton does publish part three, but we see that in Stephenson’s volume, it refers to the way things work economically and politically in our world as well as the way they do physically.

Volume II, The Confusion, suggested that there might be something special to the gold that Jack Shaftoe and his Cabal stole. Here we discover that it indeed is denser than normal gold. The gold was mined by the Spanish from the Solomon Islands. Those islands were first discovered and claimed by Spain. An unknown cartographer named them after Solomon because he thought they were the Biblical Ophir where Solomon was to have imported gold from (see II Chronicles 8:18). Tie that in with the strange isotope and alchemical lore, suddenly Isaac Newton and many others were out to locate and claim the stolen gold. Perhaps the extra mass included the Essential Quicksilver or what Hawthorne called the Elixir of Life.

Like Volume I of the Baroque Cycle, Stephenson divided The System of the World into three stories or novels: “Solomon’s Gold,” “Currency,” and “The System of the World.” In this case, the stories are sequential and mostly set in England, so Volume III reads more like a single story. We continue to follow the lives of our three main protagonists, Jack Shaftoe, the “L’Emmerdeur”; Eliza, the double duchess; and Daniel Waterhouse, the intellectual lapsed Puritan. However, there is a shift in emphasis.

Waterhouse is clearly the main character here. He is the one who connects Jack, Eliza, and many of the other characters like Isaac Newton. Unlike the other two volumes which cover decades, The System of the World takes place entirely in the year of 1714. George I, the first Hanoverian monarch, would take the throne of England, and it seems much of the other events in some way or another emphasize the changes taking place in England and the Western World.

Waterhouse has returned from Cambridge, Massachusetts Bay Colony, where he has attempted to begin the Massachusetts Bay Colony Institute of Technical Arts, an ultimately failing precursor to M.I.T., the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He meets up with Thomas Newcomen who is looking for backers for his latest project, what we know today at the Newcomen engine. Using Hooke’s “internal combustion” steam engine, he has designed a device that he hopes will pump water out of the bottom of coal mines in Cornwall and Devon, so the mines will continue to be productive.

Waterhouse has also teamed with Leibniz, who has come to England with Tsar Peter the Great of Russia, to work on a kind of early binary computer. Using the on/off one/zero base two, he hopes to develop a language-based, hand-cranked device to do calculations. His plan is to include Wilkins’ linguistic ideas so that it can handle language, not just numbers. He imagines it using punch cards such as weavers use for patterns. Oh, and the best punch cards are made out of the heavy gold, something everyone wants.

Peter the Great contrasts significantly with the British monarchs and Louis XIV who also appear in the Cycle. He is a pure tyrant. He gets what he wants without question. He also is very large and can physically fight mano a mano if he has to. He sees a lot of potential in what Leibniz is proposing, but it seems he will mostly use it to try to consolidate power. This came out nearly twenty years ago, but Peter the Great in this story certainly sounds a lot like the current ruler of Russia.

Clearly, we know historically that such a device as Stephenson imagines Leibniz assembling would become the basis of the computer, but the first crude punch-card calculator was not developed until the nineteenth century. Binary computer languages, of course, would typify the twentieth century and continue to the present, though we no longer use punch cards very often. Stephenson is having fun with technology. I should note that he also mentions the Longitude Act of 1714 offering a prize for the inventor of a system that finds longitude. That prize would eventually be claimed after many challenging trials, but that goes twenty-one years past 1714.

There are also hints of other things in the future. At one point there is a conversation about whether words have meanings. This sounds like a discussion of postmodernism, though we can note that Shakespeare villains sometimes excuse their evil by saying words are mere puffs of air and have no significance.

Still, the events of the time period covered in the Cycle “swept away not merely Governments but whole Systems of Thought, like Khans of the Mind” (376). Fascinating indeed.

There are some other plot lines. Jack Shaftoe has returned to England, now King of the Vagabonds, and Waterhouse has obtained the Solomonic gold from him for Liebniz’s project. Part of the story tells the convoluted plot that gets the gold plates for the calculating machine out of England so Leibniz can work on his machine in Russia. Part of the story also intersects Jack with Newton.

Until the end of this volume, Jack is not observed. Everyone knows he is in town, but he is a kind of MacHeath or Scarlet Pimpernel. He does things, does not get caught, but everyone knows who is behind these things. He confesses that he is doing it for the love of Eliza, who vowed to have nothing more to do with him when they parted in Volume I.

There is a potential monetary crisis in England. Newton is now in charge of the mint. Unlike previous Wardens of the Royal Mint, he takes his job seriously. His random tests show that about twenty percent of the silver coins in circulation are counterfeits. He blames Jack for much of that. After all, Jack had learned about coining and precious metals during his world-ranging adventures. Jack’s new street handle is Jack the Coiner. Newton is determined to catch him. Counterfeiting is high treason, so that means quartering, not just hanging.

Newton, like most Puritans, is a Whig. The Whigs seem to have the upper hand with the new king but not with the old queen. The Tories want to make the Whigs and Newton look bad, so when the queen dies, they call for a Trial of the Pyx. The Pyx is a casket that contains the legal weights, measures, and samples of the coins of the realm. If the Pyx has been tampered with, it could cause a monetary crisis.

Now the Pyx is kept inside a room with six locks on its door in the Tower of London. People suspect that somehow Jack the Coiner has broken into the Pyx and replaced some of the coins and weights used as standards with counterfeits. The Tories see an opportunity to make Newton and the Whigs look bad and start a scandal that will make them popular with both the new king and the voting public.

Jack’s brother Bob also has a part in this volume. He is now a sergeant in John Churchill’s army. Thanks to his military victories on the Continent, Churchill is now the Duke of Marlborough. As most armies at this time are led by noblemen, some armies lean Whig, some lean Tory. Protestant Marlborough leans Whig, and they have a part to play in the transition of the monarchy.

Meanwhile, Eliza has befriended Dappa, a black sailor from the crew of the ship that Waterhouse sailed on. Dappa is arrested and jailed because he is an escaped slave. His putative owner is one Mr. White. Eliza, of course, was a slave herself and promotes abolition. She encourages Dappa to write broadsides. He is arrested for theft. He escaped; therefore, he possesses stolen property. Obviously, he makes fun of that logic. How can he steal himself? And, more succinctly, how can a man be someone else’s property?

Queen Anne dies, King George is crowned. The coronation ceremony is so long that the boys’ choir grew beards (760 ;-0). But the focus and climax of the tale will be October 29, 1714. Jack has finally been arrested and sentenced to hang on that day. The same day has been set aside for the Trial of the Pyx. To say much more would be a spoiler. It is enough to say that there is a lot of action.

There are horse chases and coach chases. There is a intrigue in the literal underground: cellars, sewers, and tunnels. Those parts are reminiscent of From Russia with Love. The land and sea adventures and political intrigues may remind readers of Evangeline or I Promessi Sposi (The Betrothed). The System of the World is both clever and believable.

It also shows us new ways of thinking about things. Newton and Leibniz’s “System of the World” has become the way we see things in the physical world—with some recent modification, of course, by relativity and subatomic observations. Stephenson presents Leibniz as more of a deist. The Creator is the great watchmaker. Newton is the Puritan (though a suspected Arian). He says, “Think not of him as a watchmaker but as a king.” God did not merely wind things up and let them run down, but he actively rules and oversees his work. If God were merely a watchmaker, “he could be removed without any diminution” (677).

Leibniz also represents the old way of doing things. He joined the court of Hanover and later the court of the Tsar. He is looking for “some prince” to finance his plans. The new way of doing things is different. Newcomen looked for investors. When his engine worked, the mines produced and more of his engines were made. The investors, the miners, the inventor, the mine owners, and the public all benefited.

The new banking system also made things safer from government confiscation. Instead of stashes of precious metals, banks deal with contracts and loans and promises. The middle class is growing. Indeed, the one real villain of the story, the Inquisitor De Gex, hates the new system. He looks nostalgically on the system of nobility-clergy-peasantry as the way things ought to be done. In doing so, he is paraphrasing Marx as much as Machiavelli.

There is a very satisfying epilogue. It is not giving too much away by saying we see how things in 1714 are in France, in Russia, in England, in the Carolinas, and in New England. We can easily see seeds of what would happen in the following centuries in those places. We can still learn and get direction from those things today.

Stephenson is not only telling us a very entertaining tale and suggesting where we would be headed, he is also showing us where we came from. These things are the foundation of modern civilization and science. We should consider ending where we began:

Those who assume hypotheses as first principles of their speculations…may indeed form an ingenious romance, but a romance it will still be. (Quicksilver 1)

The Baroque Cycle is a romance, truly, but it is something much more as well. It does reflect the system of the world as we know it.

The Confusion – Review

This reviews the second volume of the Baroque Cycle. To begin reviewing, go to the review of the first volume, Quicksilver.

Neal Stephenson. The Confusion. Morrow, 2004. The Baroque Cycle.

The Confusion is the second volume of The Baroque Cycle, and it continues the story begun in Volume 1, Quicksilver. Stephenson has this volume divided into two stories “Bonanza” and “Juncto.” Unlike the first volume, in this volume the books go back and forth in alternating chapters to keep the chronological order more or less intact.

When we left Jack Shaftoe in Quicksilver, he had been taken captive on the seas. When we see him again in The Confusion, he is a galley slave for an Algerian businessman. Of course, in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, merchants from the Barbary Coast were basically pirates. This businessman and his crew are planning their biggest heist yet.

Shaftoe and some of his colleagues, all slaves, figure out a scheme to outsmart their master. The scheme succeeds, sort of. They do get liberated but end up in all kinds of more serious scrapes, too. The plot gets quite involved, but it is not too much of a spoiler to say that the Cabal, as they call themselves, of ten men pledged to each other captures a Spanish Galleon off the coast of Spain. The vessel reportedly is filled with silver from Mexico and Peru. However, it turns out that the vessel is filled with gold instead.

While Shaftoe and company initially make off with the gold, rumors abound. Basically, it seems that as the story develops, its not that the vessel they thought contained silver really contained gold, but that the gold that was captured had been changed from silver to gold through alchemy. This was not just any gold, but gold associated with the wisest man in history—and a favorite of alchemists and secret lodges—King Solomon. This gets some of the characters we met in Quicksilver involved including Daniel Waterhouse and Isaac Newton.

Shaftoe’s adventures will take him around the world with significant stops in Malta, Egypt, India, the Philippines, Japan, Mexico, and finally back to Europe in Qwghlm and France. His adventures are sometimes swashbuckling and sometimes oppressive. If Quicksilver included a picaresque tale, The Confusion is more like an Odyssey or an Argosy. Shaftoe survives torture, betrayal, slavery, illness, shipwreck, just to name a few. He also spends time as a king in India under an Emperor and as a prisoner of the Inquisition in Mexico.

Some of his companions include Nyazi, a Nubian slave; Varj Esphanhian, a member of the Armenian family that befriended him in Paris; Goto, a Japanese priest from Manila; Moseh de la Cruz, a Spanish Jew with a Christian surname; Yevgeny the Raskolnik from Russia. Jack’s sons, now adult Vagabonds themselves, show up. And among other things, Jack has the opportunity to avenge his friend Eliza. It is complicated. One would have thought that the person responsible for her enslavement was a Barbary corsair or merchant. But there were Europeans who successfully traded with North Africa and the Levant without encountering difficulties because of business arrangements they made.

The chapters titled “Bonanza” cover Shaftoe’s adventures. They do overlap some with events in “Juncto” which focus on Europe, especially the machinations or business arrangements of Eliza, who becomes a duchess in a couple of different ways as she socially climbs in the French court and in the German city states. Because they marry among each other so much, the royal houses often overlap, so her friendship with the dispossessed widow of a minor Elector turns into a friendship with a woman who will become Queen of England (though that eventuality is beyond the scope of these tales).

Eliza develops a scheme that today we would call derivative trading that bankrupts an enemy. However, the famous French privateer Jean Bart temporarily bankrupts her when he attacks the ship she is traveling on. There is, of course, a little word play since derivative is also a term from calculus, and both Newton and Leibniz are significant characters in this tale.

We note that even back then kings and politicians tried to cover their debts by inflating the currency. Both Eliza and Daniel Waterhouse, a main character from Volume I, witness the establishment of the Bank of England, the first insurance brokers, and the origins of Lloyd’s. I recall reading that in the nineteenth century some Christian groups taught against insurance because they said it was a kind of gambling. Stephenson may make a case for that as well—perhaps one could argue that the risk is spread so that the gamble becomes manageable.

Still, both Eliza and Jack Shaftoe take many risks. Their paths do not cross, but they are aware of one another. Even from different continents, word eventually travels as Eliza rises in status and the tales of L’Emmerdeur continue to spread.

Leibniz takes a larger role in the “Juncto.” He and Newton form a kind of mutual admiration society—tough at arm’s length. He has his own philosophical theories. And he continues to speculate on free will and atoms. Heady and entertaining! And Stephenson presents an observation on light from Newton that sounds almost poetic. Indeed, Stephenson is very clever in his use of simile and metaphor throughout the Cycle. Here Newton is speaking to Daniel Waterhouse who is holding a prismatic piece of broken glass in his hand:

Now consider the light you are catching in your hands. It has traveled a hundred million miles from the Sun without being affected in any wise by the Cœlestial Æther. In its passage through the atmosphere it has been subjected to only slight distortions. And yet in traversing a quarter of an inch of window-glass, its course is bent, and it is riven into several colors. It is such an everyday thing that we do not mark it; yet pray consider for a moment how remarkable it is! During its hundred-million-mile passage, is it not acted upon by the gravity of the sun, which is powerful enough to hold mighty Jupiter in its grasp, though at a much greater remove? And is it not acted upon as well by the gravity of the Earth and Moon, and all the other planets? And it seems perfectly insensible to these mighty forces. Yet there is embedded within this shard of glass some hidden Force that bends it and splits it with no effort. It’s as if a cannonball hurled at infinite speed from some gun of inconceivable might, and passing through ramparts and bulwarks as if they were shadows, were deflected and shivered into bits by a child holding up a feather. What could be concealed within an ordinary piece of window-glass that harbors such potency, and yet affects you and me not at all? (423, Stephenson occasionally affects archaic spelling.)

The novel at one point quotes an actual letter written by Liselotte (daughter of the Elector and wife of the Duke of Orleans, hence sister-in-law to Louis XIV) to Sophie (Princess of Hanover, mother of King George I and the first Queen of Prussia) in 1706 which summarizes much of the story:

The upheavals of the last twenty years have been unbelievable: the kingdoms of England, Holland, and Spain have been transformed as fast as scenery in a theatre. When later generations come to read about our history, they will think they are reading a romance, and not believe a word of it. (811)

Romance in 1706 meant “a work of prose fiction” or what we today call a novel. Many things happened in those years. Those events really solidified the economic and scientific systems that still work today—though both are now heavily challenged. The politics also set the scene for a relatively peaceful Western World that would only be disrupted by Napoleon and the two World Wars. Yes, the Baroque Cycle is fiction, but it reveals a lot of history and gives us much food for thought.

And the tale does not end. Both Eliza and Jack encounter obstacles at the very end of the book. Clearly there is more to come. That is our next assignment, the third volume of the Cycle.

P.S. Samuel Pepys’ Diary also tells us of a businessman, who may also have been something of a crank, try to tell people that he had discovered some of King Solomon’s gold. In other words, such a belief was circulating in those days. We see this played out more thoroughly in Volume III, The System of the World.

Quicksilver – Review

Neal Stephenson. Quicksilver. Morrow, 2003. The Baroque Cycle.

We are fans of Neal Stephenson. We appeared to have a little extra time. It was time to tackle The Baroque Cycle. Quicksilver is the first volume. This volume, though, contains three books itself. It has a lot to say about the origins of our modern Western culture along with warnings about losing touch with important roots. At the same time, it is a collection of some truly entertaining stories.

Like Stephenson’s Cryptonomicon, there are a number of historical figures in The Baroque Cycle. Unlike Cryptonomicon, some figure prominently, though the main characters are still fictional. We meet such well-known figures as William of Orange, Louis XIV, Isaac Newton, Samuel Pepys, John Locke, Gottfried Leibniz, Benjamin Franklin, Nell Gwynn, Mother Goose, and the list goes on. Stephenson or his editors have included a list of characters typical of some editions of Russian novels to help the readers. I had to consult this a few times, especially when coming across a name of French nobility, of which there are many based on real people.

The first book in Quicksilver is itself titled “Quicksilver.” It is perhaps the most profound of the three pieces in this volume. The image of the planet, god, and element Mercury appear a number of times throughout this tale. At the most basic level, it is a story of the transition from alchemy and astrology to natural sciences (called at the time and in the book natural philosophy) and the scientific method. Indeed, the epigraph to the story is worth remembering today. It is from the introduction to Newton’s Principia written by his associate Roger Cotes, who also makes a brief appearance in the novel:

Those who assume hypotheses as first principles of their speculations…may indeed form an ingenious romance, but a romance it will still be. (1)

Romance, of course, in 1713 meant “fictional tale.” We see today too many hypotheses accepted as proven science when they are really mere hypotheses. I am old enough to recall the supposed end of the world by 1990 because of overpopulation, or the disaster that will be caused by global cooling in the eighties, not to mention the ongoing and ever-changing mythology of evolution. That is right, I said global cooling. People worried about a “new Ice Age.” Any wonder some of us old-timers are equally skeptical of global warming alarmists?

In Quicksilver, we mostly see the story through the eyes of one Daniel Waterhouse, son of a Puritan politician. The story goes back and forth between the early 1700s and the mid 1600s. Waterhouse and Isaac Newton were roommates at Cambridge, and they keep in touch. Waterhouse will eventually become Secretary of the Royal Society. The controversy at the time in the R.S. is how seriously should alchemy be taken. Clearly some ideas of the alchemists have been proven experimentally, but most are mystical hypotheses.

Waterhouse has a way of being peripherally involved in many exciting events—but always on the periphery. During the 1665 plague, Waterhouse visits Newton, who has had to leave Cambridge when it closed from the pestilence. Readers of history may know that it was during this time when Newton was confined to his mother’s country estate that he saw the apple fall from the tree and made the connection between gravity and planetary motion. In Quicksilver, Newton hints to his friend that he is working on something, but he expresses reluctance to talk much about it.

“Quicksilver,” the novel within the volume, is itself ingenious. We get Leibniz’s side of the calculus controversy which includes discussions of the base two or binary system and prime numbers. We also meet another R.S. member (a historical figure) John Wilkins. Wilkins, an Anglican Bishop, was among other things an author of numerous books, including a science fiction piece on life on the moon, some books on mathematics, and a book entitled Mercury, or the Secret and Swift Messenger. This is generally credited as being first book in English on cryptography. In the novel it is called the Cryptonomicon. It not only presents ideas for safe written codes, but also speculates about the origin of language and finding numerical equivalents. Using the title Cryptonomicon could be considered a shameless plug on Stephenson’s part for his own work by that name.

Stephenson will, in the course of the volume, make use of coded writings using not only Wilkins’ hypotheses but Leibniz’s binary numbers. Of course, readers today are reminded of computer code. We can look back and say here were the origins. Indeed, the book quotes Leibniz, who seems to be extending Wilkins’ ideas:

Once the characteristic numbers of most notions are determined, the human race will have a new kind of tool, a tool that will increase the power of the mind more than optical lenses helped our eyes, a tool that will be far superior to microscopes or telescopes as reason is to vision. (260)

Indeed, much seemingly impossible mathematical and language work has been made possible by the computer.

Because the characters include Calvinists like Waterhouse and Newton and scientists of other theological stripes, there are some fascinating philosophical questions. Leibniz says when speaking to Waterhouse:

“This is one of the two great labyrinths into which the human minds are drawn: the question of free will versus predestination. You were raised to believe in the latter. You have rejected it—which must have been a great spiritual struggle—and become a thinker. You have adopted a modern, mechanical philosophy. But that very philosophy seems to be leading you back towards predestination. It is most difficult.” (279)

As Thomasina in Stoppard’s Arcadia asks: “Is God a Newtonian?”

While “Quicksilver,” the book, is a far-ranging tale of discovery during the early Enlightenment, it has sparks of real genius as it deals with questions we still deal with—and ideas that hopefully will get us thinking about what is true science and what is mere romance.

The second book in the volume Quicksilver is titled “King of the Vagabonds.” While there is some cross-pollination from the first book, especially with Waterhouse and Leibniz, this story focuses on a different set of characters.

Here we meet Jack Shaftoe, a Vagabond or street kid from London. He gets recruited by the diplomatic and noble family of the Churchills to be a messenger and serve in John Churchill’s army. He, like Waterhouse in the first book, encounters significant historical events, the main one being the Siege of Vienna in 1683.

Readers familiar with European history, understand that September 11, 1683, was the farthest incursion into Eastern Europe by Muslims under the Ottoman Turks. The Turks were repulsed beginning the next day by troops led the Polish King Sobieski.

Jack happens to be there and rescues a slave girl from a Turkish encampment. He also takes well-bred Turkish war horse and a fancy scimitar as the Turks retreat. The slave girl turns out to be Eliza, taken from the Scottish isles of Qwghlm and recently placed into the harem of a Turkish general. Because the general has been preoccupied with politics and war, she is still a virgin but has been given a very detailed sex education, growing up since about the age of five among the odalisques of the sultan’s harem. Her mother is still in the harem, but Eliza was given as a gift to the general.

The “King of the Vagabonds” is a picaresque novel, in some ways very different from “Quicksilver.” Jack and Eliza travel through much of central and northern Europe seeking adventure and ways to make money. They meet Leibniz in Leipzig and learn about silver mining in the mountains of Germany. They end up in Holland where there has been war with Spain and war with France is threatened. Eliza, very attractive and still a virgin, ends up in the French court. Let us just say that Jack Shaftoe physiologically resembles Hemingway’s Jake Barnes.

Eliza is also very intelligent. She has learned some science and math from Leibniz and some commerce and banking while in the Netherlands. She begins to see how politics can affect the markets and becomes an informal financial advisor and spy to some French nobles, notably the ambassador Jean-Antoine d’Avaux, son of a count and president of the French Parlement. He is often referred to as Count d’Avaux, though his older brother has the title.

Jack and Eliza live by their wits. They both manage to move on and move upward. Jack occasionally has crossed paths with Waterhouse and seems to have an understanding of what has been going on in English politics. At one point there is a kind of self-referential discussion about novels between Eliza and Leibniz, who is chuckling over a novel that he is reading:

“Oh, all these novels are the same—they are about picaroons—that means sort of a rogue or a scoundrel—could be male or female—they move about from city to city like Vagabonds (than, whom, however, they much more clever and resourceful)—getting into scrapes and making fools—or trying to—out of Dukes, Bishops, Generals, and

“…Doctors.” (435, italics and ellipsis in original)

Hmm. Jack escapes with his life a few times, including a claustrophobic episode where he is being chased by witches and witch-hunters through those silver mines. Some of the stories about him are spread orally and eventually are written down—with some exaggeration—into a collection of stories called L’Emmerdeur. The French get excited when they encounter Jack “l’Emmerdeur” and seem to respect Eliza because she knows him. The word Emmerdeur is politely translated “troublemaker,” but has stronger, scatological roots.

When we last see Jack, he is in the Mediterranean Sea on a ship. It seems that he may end up being captured by Turks as Eliza and her mother were back on Qwghlm. The tale will continue.

Stephenson is creating a mythos here, maybe akin to Yoknapatawpha Countys’s characters. People named Waterhouse and Shaftoe appear in his Cryptonomicon, set in the twentieth century. They are apparently descendants of the adventurers in The Baroque Cycle. Similarly, he brings up the (fictional) island pair of Qwghlm off the coast of Scotland. The Qwghlm language is what we would call a linguistic isolate. It has sixteen consonant sounds and is written without vowels. Not only does Eliza speak the language, but Jack has picked up some of it from his background. In some cases, using Qwghlm in Quicksilver reminds readers of Navaho code-talkers. Not only are people using cryptography, but using cryptography in a language that few people know.

“Odalisque,” the third book of Quicksilver, is set largely in the French court at Versailles, where Eliza has taken up residence as a nanny to a son and daughter of the Marquis d’Ozoir. She attends many social functions when they are masquerades because she is disguised so her escort can bring her without any social stigma. It is not giving away too much by saying that eventually she is given two titles, one by King Louis XIV himself for her intelligence (of both kinds).

The title is a bit ironic. The tale does focus on Eliza, with some side episodes involving Daniel Waterhouse, but she is not anyone’s mistress. Even though she has learned much about sex during her time in the Turkish harem, she really has kept herself aloof from most men’s advances. While it sounds oxymoronic, there is a sense of chaste ribaldry in these tales.

Eliza ends up in Holland. She and Waterhouse both become peripheral witnesses to the Glorious Revolution of 1688 when William and Mary became monarchs of England. Waterhouse, a political survivor like his father, witnesses an episode in the escape of King James II. He then goes to London where he sees celebrations in the streets over the coming of William and Mary.

Eliza, mostly through letters written in code, is able to get the French to send their army farther south. Though France is technically at war with Holland and William, the information she shares with the French make it sound more urgent that they fight for the Palatinate in the southern Rhineland, leaving William’s forces free to go to England. William’s wife Mary is the daughter of King James II, but she is Protestant. Yes, Quicksilver includes a few royal genealogies so we can see the various claims to various kingdoms, dukedoms, and other entities.

Much of “Odalisque” is epistolary—we read the story largely through letters. Most of the letters are written by Eliza to D’Avaux and Leibniz with some return letters from them. There are goings on in the French court but also in various battlefields. At one point, trying to assist a French duchess in her claims on the Palatinate, she disappears. That is how she ends up in Holland.

We also get updated on some of the scientific and mathematical developments. Leibniz had admitted that his essay on calculus could probably only be understood by one other person in the world, namely Newton, but his letters do include some interesting scientific and mathematical observations.

One fascinating letter from Leibniz suggests that while the function mv (mass times velocity) is useful for understanding acceleration, because gravity’s effect is the inverse square, the function mv2 may be more significant. Two hundred years later, of course, where c is the velocity of light, Einstein showed us that E=mc2. Leibniz saw something, even if he could not quite put his finger on it.

In the same letter, he also speculates on what we now call the anthropic principle. We observe nature and can make calculations about how nature will behave, for example the gravitational attraction, centrifugal forces, or chemical reactions. How important are these numbers? Back then, Leibniz was interested them but skeptical of their significance. Now we know that even slight variation of any one of hundreds of constants would preclude life. Leibniz was wondering how much intelligence would be needed to put the universe together. Now we have pretty good idea.

Somewhere in her adventures, Eliza becomes pregnant. We also get occasional updates on the progress of Waterhouse’s difficulties with his bladder stone. Stephenson effectively juxtaposes the medical and political challenge of her breech birth with Waterhouse’s bladder surgery. Pepys encourages Waterhouse since he had a large stone surgically removed from his own bladder. Something old and irritating is being removed, while someone else is giving birth: a parallel to what has been happening to the British throne.

We are witnesses with our protagonists to much European history. This is significant history because Quicksilver shares the roots of our modern Western and especially Anglo-American culture. It reminds us of what freedom is and what the true scientific method is. In some ways people today are still struggling against despotism and alchemy. Stephenson suggests to his readers, though, that the truth will set us free.

P.S. When checking Samuel Pepys’ Diary, I did find out that Pepys indeed had a bladder stone surgically removed—no anesthetic in those days! It was about the size of a tennis ball. So Pepys setting up Daniel Waterhouse’s surgery fits in.

N.B, The Baroque Cycle originally came out in three volumes. The first two together contain five novels. Here I italicize the volume title and put the story title in quotation marks, though each is a novel in itself. Kindle sells both the Volume and the first novel as separate downloads. Similarly, the paperback versions of the Cycle are sold book by book, not by Volume. Be aware of that if you try to locate certain editions of this series.

Interface – Review

Neal Stephenson and J. Frederick George. Interface. Bantam, 1994.

Imagine a presidential candidate who often has memory lapses and uses the wrong word and who mostly campaigns from his hometown, rarely traveling while campaigning. His running mate is a black woman who is fairly well known but who has had limited political experience.

No, this is not about the 2020 American election. This novel came out in 1994 and imagined a 1996 election with unusual circumstances.

The current president in 1996, who is never named, decides to solve the national debt by simply erasing it—or as he puts it, “forgives” the debt. Yes, that is the word he uses. No, not just college loans but the trillion dollar biggie. Needless to say, the current president’s popularity tanks, giving an opportunity not just for the opposition party (also not named specifically) but also for a third party candidate.

Immediately, we understand that this is a political novel that has something to do with integrity. “In the old days, contract was sacred: divorce, bankruptcy, fraud, were taboo for the average people.” (23) But not for the elites. Governments can do anything they can get away with, so it seems. At one time it was the robber barons. Nowadays it is Silicon Valley. Stephenson and George present a warning, but also a very entertaining tale.

A political advisor and de facto campaign manager says:

“In the 1700s, politics was all about ideas. But Jefferson came up with all the good ideas. In the 1800s, it was all about character. But no one will ever have as much character as Lincoln and Lee. For much of the 1900s it was about charisma. But we no longer trust charisma because Hitler used it to kill Jews and JFK used it to [seduce women] and send us to Vietnam.” (92)

What does contemporary politics focus on, then?

“Scrutiny. We are in the Age of Scrutiny. A public figure must withstand the scrutiny of the media…The President is the ultimate public figure and must stand up under ultimate scrutiny; he is like a man stretched out on rack in the public square in some medieval [backwater] of a town, undergoing the rigors of the Inquisition. Like the medieval trial by ordeal, the Age of Scrutiny sneers at rational inquiry and debate, and presumes that mere oaths and protestations are deceptions and lies. The only way to discover the real truth is by the rite of the ordeal, which exposes the subject to such inhuman strain that any defect in his character will cause him to crack wide open like a flawed diamond.” (92)

This analyst goes on to confess, “We do not have the strength to change the minds of the illiterate multitude. But we do have the wit to exploit their foolishness” (94).

One joke that might be slightly dated is what Interface calls the common overnight delivery service. Back in the nineties FedEx really had no competition and seemed to be everywhere. In the novel, they call it Global Omnipresent Delivery Systems, or GODS. It still rates a chuckle, though now in my neighborhood Amazon trucks are closer to being omnipresent. (The name GODS reminded this reader of Wallace’s Organization of North American Nations or ONAN, another deliberately pointed acronym.)

The main thrust of the story, though, is the interface between neurosurgery and microtechnology. A Silicon Valley/Delhi corporation has developed a microchip that can interface with the human nervous system. One of the early users of this system is the governor of Illinois, Willy Cozzano, who has suffered a stroke—with all of the mental and physical side effects you would expect. But his handlers keep him sequestered during his recovery—a recovery which a chip implanted in his brain expedites or, perhaps, causes.

If Interface sounds a little like the Manchurian Candidate, it is. Only the power that “helps” Gov. Cozzano is not a foreign government, but a kind of industrial cabal, the contemporary version of the robber barons. It includes some old money and titled Europeans as well as Silicon Valley types.

Cozzano does have one thing going for him besides his popularity as governor. His daughter is a neurologist. She begins to understand what is going on, but to get her father back to his old self will mean a real struggle. When we study Hamlet, I tell my students that Hamlet is able to restore justice to Denmark, but it comes at a price. The same thing is true with Interface.

Typical of Stephenson, there is a lot of wit. I suspect Mr. George’s contribution was more on the political end of things. One great quotation from Eleanor Richmond, the vice-presidential candidate, nails it:

“Spending money won’t help. Neither will writing educational software to run on your home TV set. It’s just a question of values. If your family places a high value on being educated, you’ll get educated, even if you have to do your homework on the back of a shovel. And if your family doesn’t give a [hoot] about developing your mind, you’ll grow up stupid and ignorant even if you go to the fanciest private school in America.

“Now unfortunately, I can’t give you a program to help develop people’s values. Personally, I’m starting to think that the fewer programs we have, the better off we are.” (463-463)

If you are starting to think that Interface is a political screed, it is not. It is a tightly written and wild story. This is, after all, the same guy who wrote Snow Crash. If his The Big U skewers academia and Zodiac satirizes the environmental movement, then Interface raises interesting questions about politics, technology, money, and power. January 6, 2021, in Washington D.C. was a circus. What if there were something like that, but it was really organized with lots of money and powerful people behind it? Instead of a bunch of anarchists, what if Zuckerberg, Gates, and some folks from UNESCO had initiated it? What if such an international figure declares “We have solved the problem of elections” (522)?

There is one brief passage in this book that sheds a little understanding on the previous book we reviewed. In People of the Book, Hanna’s mother is a prominent neurosurgeon who is uncommonly overbearing. In Interface, Willy’s neurologist daughter explains that that is typical of the profession:

“Neurosurgeons are the ultimate macho [jerks] of the medical world. Nobody can stand them. Their solution to everything is cold steel.” (137)

Stephenson and George here use their imagination to construct a scenario that does not seem that distant. This is not colonizing the moon or creating a digital “metaverse.” We already carry chip cards and our pets have implanted chips. But there is more. This gets to two of the most serious questions we can ask ourselves: What is truth? What it means to be human? Their corollaries follow: How free are we? How free can we be?

Book Reviews and Observations on the English Language